U.S. Infant Mortality Ranking [Updated]
Newly released data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention show that 6.71 infants per 1,000 births died in 2006, a rate that’s down slightly from the 2005 rate of 6.86 per 1,000, but not enough to indicate improvement, reports the CDC. The rate hasn’t really budged since the year 2000, reports the L.A. Times: “Premature birth and low birth weight are by far the biggest causes of infant death.” And while it’s true that more women are giving birth to twins and triplets resulting from fertility treatment, and these babies are more likely to be born premature, “even accounting for those trends, premature births are increasing.” In an editorial today, the New York Times writes that the causes of infant mortality are complex: “Some researchers blame an increase in premature births, many by Caesarean section. The chief lesson we draw is that the American health care system, despite the highest expenditures in the world, is badly in need of an overhaul.” Among industrialized countries, the U.S. ranks 29th in infant survival.

Optimal childbirth leads to optimal conditions for breastfeeding (which provides optimal nutrition and immunity for newborns): babies who are born awake and alert, who didn’t have a suction tube put down their throat, who were not induced or scheduled and therefore are breathing with lungs that are fully mature, whose lungs reaped the physiological benefits of vaginal birth, who get immediate skin-to-skin contact with their mother, who are not routinely separated from their mother, and who are born to mothers in relatively good shape (i.e. not recovering from surgery) — these mother-baby pairs are more likely to breastfeed, and breastfeed exclusively. They’re also more likely to breastfeed if their hospital doesn’t give out pacifiers, supplement with formula, or send mom home with freebie formula samples.
An editorial in the 


